Ir al contenido principal

Etiquetas: declaración

IINE Statement on Court Ruling Blocking Revocation of TPS for Haiti

IINE Statement on Court Ruling Blocking Revocation of TPS for Haiti

We are deeply grateful to U.S. District Judge Ana C. Reyes for blocking the federal administration’s attempt to end Temporary Protected Status for over 350,000 Haitians living in the U.S. In doing so, Judge Reyes recognizes the rights of our Haitian community members and the life-threatening conditions they would be exposed to if forced to return.

At IINE, we see daily how essential Haitian immigrants are to our communities, our workforce, and our country’s future, especially here in Massachusetts. As Governor Maura Healey notes, not only does this ruling provide relief for Haitian families in the Commonwealth, “It also protects against a harmful disruption to the Massachusetts’ economy, as Haitian TPS holders are an integral part of…the health care sector. If President Trump had his way, thousands of nurses, home health aides, and other essential employees would not have been able to work tomorrow, and patients and families who are dependent on caregivers would have suffered.”

In recent years IINE has helped more than 13,000 Haitian immigrants to access food, healthcare, and shelter, grow their English language skills, find and advance in their jobs, and receive professional legal support. As these families have put down roots here, they have contributed immensely to our economy and culture. They deserve the safety, stability, and dignity this ruling upholds.

We will continue to join leaders at the federal, state, and city levels in advocating for our Haitian community members, because their protection must last as long as the dangers they face.

IINE Statement on the Fatal Shootings by Federal Agents in Minneapolis

IINE Statement on the Fatal Shootings by Federal Agents in Minneapolis

UPDATE 1/26/26:

On Saturday, January 24, another individual, acting within their constitutional rights, was killed at the hands of federal agents in Minneapolis. In spite of its claims to be doing the opposite, the administration continues to terrorize our communities, bringing new levels of danger and inhumanity to Minnesota, Maine, and beyond. IINE is committed to speaking out and fighting back. Join our efforts by signing up for our advocacy alerts

ORIGINAL 1/9/26:

The fatal shooting of a U.S. citizen by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in Minneapolis on January 7 is a tragedy and the most dire outcome of unchecked authority.  

ICE continues to operate outside the bounds of law, and in doing so, creates immense fear and danger in our communities. We hear from our refugee and immigrant clients every week that they are afraid to go to work, take their children to school, or attend doctors’ appointments. Last year, our organization provided support to more than 12,000 new arrivals. These are brave, resilient individuals who endured difficult journeys to come to the U.S. through legal pathways. They willingly provided their information to the U.S. government and have done everything they can to both comply with our nation’s increasingly complex immigration laws and to become contributing members of our communities. Yet ICE’s actions make clear that this does not guarantee their safety or fair treatment.  

ICE’s actions also erode the very trust our organization, our communities, and our local police work to build with newcomers. As part of cultural orientation, we teach new arrivals about U.S. laws and the important role of the officials who have been sworn to uphold them. Now, these lessons ring hollow as the federal government continues to target refugees and immigrants and those who welcome and support them. Furthermore, ICE’s violent act undermines the very principles of justice and due process that define our nation. 

We call on our leaders to hold those responsible for this tragedy accountable, restore trust in our institutions, and ensure that all members of our communities are treated with dignity and fairness.  

IINE Statement on the Tragic Shooting of National Guard Members in Washington, DC

IINE Statement on the Tragic Shooting of National Guard Members in Washington, DC

The International Institute of New England (IINE) is saddened by the tragic shooting of two members of the West Virginia National Guard in Washington, D.C., on November 26, 2025. We mourn the passing of a young member of the Guard who volunteered to protect and defend her country. The individual who committed this heinous act must be held accountable for their actions.  

IINE remains committed to partnering with political leaders to safely welcome immigrants and refugees to our country. We urge leaders and community members to denounce all hate-filled attacks on people because of their race, religion, or national origin, and to advocate for sound, effective procedures that ensure those who come to the U.S. meet the comprehensive requirements of our refugee and asylee laws.  

Throughout the past four years and even before that, IINE and other resettlement agencies across the country have welcomed and supported Afghan nationals, including many who were allies to our government during the 20-year war in Afghanistan. These allies and their families are among some of the most heavily vetted immigrants to come to the U.S. We have seen them fill jobs in industries short on labor, learn English, take active roles in civic and faith groups across the country, and, in many cases, become U.S. citizens. They have become our neighbors, co-workers, and friends. 

In response to the tragic shooting, the federal government has chosen to initiate vague vetting policies, which give U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services officials the discretion to deny individuals a Green Card or Lawful Permanent Resident status because of their country of origin. Rather than making our nation safer for all, this response creates fear and division, weakens due process, and wrongly uses this senseless tragedy to further a xenophobic agenda. It dishonors not only those who lawfully seek to enter our country in search of a better life but also those brave men and women who voluntarily join our armed services to protect us all. It makes us neither more safe nor more free. 

The Call for a Humane and Strategic Refugee Program in 2026

UPDATE AS OF 10/31/25 

The Presidential Determination on refugee admissions for Fiscal Year 2026 has been set at 7,500 people, the lowest ceiling in the history of a program that has enjoyed broad bipartisan support for more than four decades. This number is only a fraction of past refugee admission ceilings and was set without consulting with Congress, as required by law. It also fails to meet the urgency of today’s global displacement crisis. At the end of 2024, there was an estimated 123.2 million forcibly displaced people worldwide—families and individuals who have lost their homes and safety due to persecution, conflict, and natural disasters. The United States has been the world leader in receiving refugees, and throughout the past four decades Americans have witnessed refugees fill needed jobs, start businesses, raise families, run for office, and add tremendous value to American society.  

We implore the administration to open refugee admissions to people fleeing crises in Sudan, Myanmar, Venezuela, and other nations, including Afghanistan. Thousands of Afghan war allies, who supported our government and troops, are waiting to come here, and our nation owes them the opportunity to do so. 

As we respond to this disappointing determination, IINE and many of our peer organizations are navigating the loss of SNAP eligibility for refugees and immigrants with legal statuses under the federal policy changes enacted by the “One Big Beautiful Bill.” Instead of further destabilizing vulnerable populations, the United States should seek to build systems that are fair, humane, and representative of the values our nation has held dear since its founding.  


Six days into the new federal fiscal year, the administration has not yet consulted with Congress or released the annual Presidential Determination for refugee admissions, a requirement of the Refugee Act of 1980. This delay coincides with reports that the administration is preparing to significantly alter U.S. refugee policy.  

We are hearing that the administration intends to cut refugee admissions to 7,500 people—the lowest ceiling in U.S. history, a small fraction of the 120,000 goal set by the UN High Commision for Refugees for the international community, and a mere 6% of our country’s 2025 target of 125,000 refugees. In addition, during remarks delivered at a panel entitled “The Global Refugee and Asylum System: What Went Wrong and How to Fix It,” the U.S. Deputy Secretary of State outlined the administration’s intent to “reframe” refugee status so it becomes “temporary, not permanent,” and that “the understanding is you should go back to your country.”   

These proposed changes to federal policy fundamentally misrepresent what it means to be a refugee and fail to advance humane, effective solutions to displacement. Federal law and treaties signed by the U.S. government define refugees as individuals who are unable or unwilling to return to their home countries because of a well-founded fear of being persecuted based on race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion. The U.S. has a rigorous, multi-year vetting process to confirm this status. The goal of resettlement is to help these individuals find a durable solution and rebuild their lives peacefully and without the risk of further displacement.  

If we abandon our identity as the world’s leader in refugee resettlement, we will put real lives at risk. When the federal administration suspended the refugee program on January 20th, it left more than a hundred thousand refugees stranded overseas—despite having completed extensive vetting and already being approved for resettlement. Today, many are still waiting in refugee camps in dire conditions, desperate for the chance to rebuild their lives in safety, and in many cases, reunite with family members they have not seen for years. 

Through decades of evidence-based practice, refugee resettlement agencies like IINE have effectively partnered with federal and local governments, employers, schools, healthcare providers, and community members. This collaborative effort helps new arrivals integrate and thrive. The initial, modest investments made by public and private partners more than pay off: refugees join the U.S. workforce, contribute to the local, state, and federal tax base, purchase homes, and start businesses at a higher rate that U.S.-born residents. They shape our culture, traditions, and society in countless ways.  

Ensuring our nation continues to welcome families and individuals in need of safety is both the smart and the right thing to do. The United States has been a haven for the persecuted since the founding of the nation, and for decades, the U.S. refugee resettlement system has functioned effectively with wide bipartisan support. Welcoming refugees reflects the best of our nation’s core values – equal treatment, non-discrimination, and human dignity – making it as vital to our national identity as it is to the refugees who find a home here.  

IINE Statement on the Travel Ban

IINE Statement on the Travel Ban

The recently enacted travel ban will divide families, endanger the lives of those seeking safety in the U.S., and forsake our nation’s humanitarian legacy. The ban is predicated on the claim that the selected ountries have a “large-scale presence of terrorists,” when in reality, the individuals seeking to leave these nations are doing so to save their lives and their families. 

The International Institute of New England condemns this ban, which is another attempt to dismantle legal pathways to immigration and villainize innocent individuals and families seeking safety and stability.  

More than 90% of IINE’s current clients come from nations included in the travel ban, particularly Haiti and Afghanistan. These immigrants have endured rigorous vetting and screening, long journeys, and unimaginable trauma to find peace and safety in the U.S. The travel ban will cause irreparable human harm and hurt U.S. communities – who rely heavily on their talent and economic and cultural contributions.  

Talento como el de Efdjeen, que se vio obligada a abandonar su hogar en Haití, donde estaba completando su residencia tras licenciarse en medicina. Efdjeen siempre aspiró a ser médico, y el año pasado se graduó en el programa de Asistente de Enfermería Certificada (CNA) del IINE, con lo que dio un paso más hacia su objetivo.  

La prohibición también supone separar a familias que ya han pasado años separadas y que lo único que desean es reunirse. 

Muchos de los países expulsados son nuestros amigos, vecinos y, en el caso de Afganistán, hermanos de armas. Cuando los talibanes tomaron el control de Kabul, Sabira y su marido tuvieron que huir debido a que él había trabajado en el pasado apoyando a las fuerzas armadas estadounidenses; ahora, están solos en Massachusetts, soñando con el día en que volverán a ver a sus familias.  

The devastation the travel ban will cause is immense. We hope the ban will be successfully challenged in court, and ultimately lead to further action around the need for comprehensive immigration reform. 

IINE Statement on the Termination of TPS for Afghanistan

IINE Statement on the Termination of TPS for Afghanistan

The termination of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Afghans is based on the claim that conditions in Afghanistan have improved, but the Taliban’s continued control of the nation contradicts this assessment. Human rights violations have only worsened, with women and girls at heightened risk of facing gender-based violence, in addition to thousands of disappearances, arbitrary arrests, extrajudicial executions, attacks on freedom of expression, and the near collapse of their health system. Sending people who have fought alongside us, sought safety in the U.S., and would likely face retribution upon return to a country in crisis would be a complete reversal of our nation’s long-held values of refuge and humanitarian relief.  

IINE has a long history of welcoming and supporting Afghans from the early 2000’s to today. After the fall of Kabul, our communities stepped up and opened our doors because it was the right thing to do. Thousands of Afghans left their homes behind, and in some cases their families, to ensure their safety, including our allies who aided American troops during the war. These brave and resilient individuals have become our neighbors, colleagues, and friends – like Nazia. An English teacher in Afghanistan, Nazia fled after receiving death threats from the Taliban for daring to educate women and girls. Today, Nazia continues to teach English in the Boston-area and hopes to pursue her masters. These are the kind of people we would be turning our backs on.  

Debemos mantener nuestro compromiso de acoger a los necesitados, y podemos hacerlo. Con la aprobación de la Ley de Ajuste Afgano (AAA), el Congreso podría permitir a los afganos solicitar la tarjeta de residencia y abrirles el camino para convertirse en ciudadanos permanentes. Esto significaría que miles de afganos podrían reunirse con sus familias y, juntos, permanecer a salvo en Estados Unidos, un país al que han llegado a llamar hogar.